Skip to main content

Timothy Sheader - To Kill A Mockingbird

When Harper Lee's novel To Kill A Mockingbird was reported to have been banned from GCSE reading lists in England and Wales last year alongside other works by American writers at the behest of UK Education Secretary Michael Gove, there was an understandable outcry. Here, after all, was an iconic and much-loved Pulitzer Prize winner which, since its publication in 1960, has become a modern classic.

As Regent's Park Theatre set off on a tour of Timothy Sheader's hit west end staging of the novel which takes in three Scottish cities, what the incident highlighted was just how much of a bond readers who grew up with To Kill A Mockingbird maintain with it throughout their adult life.

“I watched what Michael Gove was saying,” says Sheader, “and he said that he wanted more of Charles Dickens, who I think is wonderful and writes great universal stories and creates wonderful characters, but they're not really about life in the same way that To Kill A Mockingbird is or in the way that John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men is. I think this was a personal bĂȘte noir of Michael Gove's, and I think he regrets it.

“It's interesting, because Meera Syal's novel, Anita and Me, was chosen by some schools to go on the syllabus in place of some of the American works, and there was this delicious irony, because Syal said she only became a writer because of reading Harper Lee.”

Set in a small town in deep south Alabama during the 1930s depression, the book's story, as told by Scout Finch recalling events when she was a young Tomboy, focuses on the trial of a black man accused of raping a white woman, with Scout's widowed lawyer father tasked to defend the accused. What follows, as Scout, her brother Jem and their friend Dill watch the trial, is a study of how institutionalised racism and 
prejudice can lead to injustice. It is also a rites of passage for Scout, who wakes up to her own attitudes towards the largely unseen figure of Boo Radley, the town's reclusive eccentric.

“It's a beautiful novel,” says Sheader, “but it's also a plea for tolerance. I think most of us read it at a certain time in our lives, as young adults, so we have that shared experience. Because of that, there's an interesting psychology that goes on about what happens when we revisit it as adults, and that's about being able to see both sides 
of the coin. When you read the book as an eleven or twelve year old, you share that same sense of exasperation about the injustices there are in the world that Scout does, but when you're older, you're more used to how the world works. It's something quite rare in theatre, in that around ninety per cent of our audience will have read the book. 
Part of the joy of our production is knowing that and celebrating it.”

Sheader's production opens up Lee's story by engaging with the audience – be it made up of grown-ups or children – in a way more directly than a naturalistic rendering of Christopher Sergel's adaptation might do.

“We read the book onstage,” Sheader says of the production's framing device. “The actors are in modern dress, and there are twelve different copies of the book onstage, which the actors read from in their own accents., as if they're reading it at home. Then gradually through this feat of shared imagination we usher these three children and Scout's father Atticus onstage. The book is full of beautiful bits of prose which don't always translate, and sometimes you just need to hear those lines beyond the pure dialogue.

While Lee's book was an instant best seller when it was first published, the story was brought into public consciousness even more by the Robert Mulligan directed cinema adaptation, which starred Gregory Peck as Atticus and Robert Duvall as Boo Radley. Both the film and stage adaptations have gone some considerable way to keeping Lee's novel evergreen.

“To Kill A Mockingbird gets done a lot onstage in much the same way as Shakespeare does,” Sheader points out. “That's partly to do with the different generations which it attracts. There are people who grew up with the book who bring their children or their grand-children, so it's not something that ever really stands still.”

Beyond the story's cross-generational appeal, an allure has grown up around the book more to do with its author and the fact that the now eighty-eight year old Lee has never published another book. Lee had taken elements of her own Alabama childhood for To Kill A Mockingbird, although she has always denied the book was autobiography.

Following the book's publication, Lee worked with her childhood friend Truman Capote – who her character Dill is partly based on – researching what end up as his 'factual novel', In Cold Blood, and rarely appeared in public. While this stoked the sorts of unfounded rumours that usually accompany any artist's withdrawal from public life, the truth was probably more mundane.

“Maybe she's had a wonderful life,” Sheader speculates. “Where do you go after writing something like To Kill A Mockingbird?  Most writers really have four great works and maybe twenty mediocre ones, so she just thought after writing one that's it.”

As Sheader's production has already proved, as far as To Kill A Mockingbird is concerned, that is far from it.

“Anything we're doing is purely to honour both Harper Lee and the novel,” he says,  “and as a storyI don't think it's lost any of it's emotional resonance. On one level it tells a beautiful story which we can all enjoy, one which crosses barriers of culture, age and race. It's a story that's a plea for tolerance and justice, not just with race, but, with Boo Radley, how people who are deemed to be a bit different are treated. The story also asks you to try and imagine what's going on beyond what's immediately 
apparent, and to look beneath the surface and into our own prejudices. That's as important a life lesson to have now as it was when the book was written.”

To Kill A Mockingbird, Theatre Royal, Glasgow, February 3-7; King's 
Theatre, Edinburgh, February 9-14; His Majesty's Theatre, Aberdeen, 
February 16-21.
www.atgtickets.com

The Herald, January 29th 2015

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Losing Touch With My Mind - Psychedelia in Britain 1986-1990

DISC 1 1. THE STONE ROSES   -  Don’t Stop 2. SPACEMEN 3   -  Losing Touch With My Mind (Demo) 3. THE MODERN ART   -  Mind Train 4. 14 ICED BEARS   -  Mother Sleep 5. RED CHAIR FADEAWAY  -  Myra 6. BIFF BANG POW!   -  Five Minutes In The Life Of Greenwood Goulding 7. THE STAIRS  -  I Remember A Day 8. THE PRISONERS  -  In From The Cold 9. THE TELESCOPES   -  Everso 10. THE SEERS   -  Psych Out 11. MAGIC MUSHROOM BAND  -  You Can Be My L-S-D 12. THE HONEY SMUGGLERS  - Smokey Ice-Cream 13. THE MOONFLOWERS  -  We Dig Your Earth 14. THE SUGAR BATTLE   -  Colliding Minds 15. GOL GAPPAS   -  Albert Parker 16. PAUL ROLAND  -  In The Opium Den 17. THE THANES  -  Days Go Slowly By 18. THEE HYPNOTICS   -  Justice In Freedom (12" Version) ...

Edinburgh Rocks – The Capital's Music Scene in the 1950s and Early 1960s

Edinburgh has always been a vintage city. Yet, for youngsters growing up in the shadow of World War Two as well as a pervading air of tight-lipped Calvinism, they were dreich times indeed. The founding of the Edinburgh International Festival in 1947 and the subsequent Fringe it spawned may have livened up the city for a couple of weeks in August as long as you were fans of theatre, opera and classical music, but the pubs still shut early, and on Sundays weren't open at all. But Edinburgh too has always had a flipside beyond such official channels, and, in a twitch-hipped expression of the sort of cultural duality Robert Louis Stevenson recognised in his novel, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, a vibrant dance-hall scene grew up across the city. Audiences flocked to emporiums such as the Cavendish in Tollcross, the Eldorado in Leith, The Plaza in Morningside and, most glamorous of all due to its revolving stage, the Palais in Fountainbridge. Here the likes of Joe Loss and Ted Heath broug...

Carla Lane – The Liver Birds, Mersey Beat and Counter Cultural Performance Poetry

Last week's sad passing of TV sit-com writer Carla Lane aged 87 marks another nail in the coffin of what many regard as a golden era of TV comedy. It was an era rooted in overly-bright living room sets where everyday plays for today were acted out in front of a live audience in a way that happens differently today. If Lane had been starting out now, chances are that the middlebrow melancholy of Butterflies, in which over four series between 1978 and 1983, Wendy Craig's suburban housewife Ria flirted with the idea of committing adultery with successful businessman Leonard, would have been filmed without a laughter track and billed as a dramady. Lane's finest half-hour highlighted a confused, quietly desperate and utterly British response to the new freedoms afforded women over the previous decade as they trickled down the class system in the most genteel of ways. This may have been drawn from Lane's own not-quite free-spirited quest for adventure as she moved through h...